Electronic Case Reporting | MIPS PI Measures for 2020 Reporting


Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange


Electronic Case Reporting
The MIPS eligible clinician is in active engagement with a public health agency to electronically submit case reporting of reportable conditions.

Measure ID:


Multiple Registry Engagement:

Report as YESif active engagement with more than one Electronic Case Reporting registry in accordance with PI_PHCDRR_3.

Multiple Registry Engagement Measure ID:


Exclusion:Any MIPS eligible clinician meeting one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from the Electronic Case Reporting measure if the MIPS eligible clinician;
1. Does not treat or diagnose any reportable diseases for which data is collected by their jurisdiction's reportable disease system during the performance period. OR
2. Operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency is capable of receiving electronic case reporting data in the specific standards required to meet the CEHRT definition at the start of the performance period. OR
3. Operates in a jurisdiction where no public health agency has declared readiness to receive electronic case reporting data as of 6 months prior to the start of the performance period.
Measure Exclusion ID:


PDF link:

Electronic Case Reporting


Definition of Terms

Active engagement:
The MIPS eligible clinician is in the process of moving towards sending "production data" to a public health agency or clinical data registry, or is sending production data to a public health agency (PHA) or clinical data registry (CDR).

Active engagement may be demonstrated in one of the following ways:

  • Option 1 – Completed Registration to Submit Data: The MIPS eligible clinician registered to submit data with the PHA or, where applicable, the CDR to which the information is being submitted; registration was completed within 60 days after the start of the MIPS performance period; and the MIPS eligible clinician is awaiting an invitation from the PHA or CDR to begin testing and validation. This option allows MIPS eligible clinicians to meet the measure when the PHA or the CDR has limited resources to initiate the testing and validation process. MIPS eligible clinicians that have registered in previous years do not need to submit an additional registration to meet this requirement for each MIPS performance period.
  • Option 2 – Testing and Validation: The MIPS eligible clinician is in the process of testing and validation of the electronic submission of data. MIPS eligible clinicians must respond to requests from the PHA or, where applicable, the CDR within 30 days; failure to respond twice within a MIPS performance period would result in that MIPS eligible clinician not meeting the measure.
  • Option 3 – Production: The MIPS eligible clinician has completed testing and validation of the electronic submission and is electronically submitting production data to the PHA or CDR.

Production data:
 Refers to data generated through clinical processes involving patient care, and it is used to distinguish between data and “test data” which may be submitted for the purposes of enrolling in and testing electronic data transfers.


Reporting Requirements

The MIPS eligible clinician must attest YES to being in active engagement with a PHA to electronically submit case reporting of reportable conditions.

For multiple registry engagement, report as YES if there is active engagement with more than one electronic case reporting registry.


Scoring Information

Required for Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Score: Yes, must select at least two of the five Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange measures
Measure Score: 10 points
Eligible for Bonus Score: No

Note: The following measures are included in the Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange objective: Immunization Registry Reporting, Electronic Case Reporting, Public Health Registry Reporting, Clinical Data Registry Reporting, and Syndromic Surveillance Reporting.

In order to earn a score greater than zero for the Promoting Interoperability performance category, MIPS eligible clinicians must:

  • Submit a “yes” to the Prevention of Information Blocking Attestations; and
  • Submit a “yes” to the ONC Direct Review Attestation, if applicable; and
  • Submit a “yes” that they have completed the Security Risk Analysis measure during the calendar year in which the MIPS performance period occurs; and
  • Report the required measures from each of the four objectives.

Additional Information

  • MIPS eligible clinicians must use 2015 Edition CEHRT. The 2015 Edition functionality must be in place by the first day of the performance period and the product must be certified to the 2015 Edition criteria by the last day of the performance period. The MIPS eligible clinicians must be using the 2015 Edition functionality for the full performance period. In many situations, the product may be deployed, but pending certification.
  • MIPS eligible clinicians are required to report certain measures from each of the four objectives, with performance-based scoring occurring at the individual measure-level. Each measure is scored based on the MIPS eligible clinician’s performance for that measure, based on the submission of a numerator/denominator,  or “yes or no” statement.
  • The measures under the Public Health and Clinical Data Exchange objective are reported using “yes or no” responses. The MIPS eligible clinician will receive the full 10 points for reporting two “yes” responses, or for submitting a “yes” for one measure and claiming an exclusion for another. If there are no “yes” responses and two exclusions are claimed, the 10 points will be redistributed to the Provide Patients Electronic Access to Their Health Information measure.
  • If reporting the active engagement with multiple registry measure (PI_PHCDRR_3_MULTI) then the objective has been met and no additional measures in this objective need to be reported.
  • Reporting more than two measures for this objective will not earn the MIPS eligible clinician any additional points, but they will meet the requirements for the objective.
  • More information about Promoting Interoperability performance category scoring is available on the QPP website.
  • The definition of jurisdiction is general, and the scope may be local, state, regional or at the national level. The definition will be dependent on the type of registry to which the provider is reporting. A registry that is ‘‘borderless’’ would be considered a registry at the national level and would be included for purposes of this measure.
  • MIPS eligible clinicians who have previously registered, tested, or begun ongoing submission of data to a registry do not need to “restart” the process.
  • MIPS eligible clinicians may claim the exclusions if they are reporting as a group. However, the group must meet the requirements of the exclusion as a group.
  • If registries have not declared, six months before the start of the performance period, whether the registry they are offering will be ready on January 1 of the upcoming year for use by providers seeking to meet performance periods in that upcoming year, MIPS eligible clinicians can claim an exclusion (83 FR 59815).
  • When MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report as a group, data should be aggregated for all MIPS eligible clinicians under one Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). This includes those MIPS eligible clinicians who may qualify for reweighting through an approved Promoting Interoperability hardship exception, hospital or ASC-based status, or in a specialty which is not required to report data to the Promoting Interoperability performance category.


Regulatory References

For further discussion, please see the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) final rule: 81 FR 77229.

For additional discussion, please see the 2018 Physician Fee Schedule final rule – Quality Payment Program final rule: 83 FR 59790.

In order to meet this measure, a MIPS eligible clinician must use the capabilities and standards of CEHRT at 45 CFR 170.315 (f)(5).


Certification Standards and Criteria

Below are the corresponding certification criteria and standards for electronic health record technology that support this measure.

Certification Criteria:
Information about certification for 2015 Edition CEHRT can be found at the links below:
§170.315(f)(5) Transmission to Public Health Agencies — Electronic Case Reporting

Certification Standards:
Standards for 2015 Edition CEHRT can be found at the ONC’s 2015 Standards Hub:

Register with MDinteractive