2020 MIPS Measure #395: Lung Cancer Reporting (Biopsy/Cytology Specimens)

Quality ID 395
High Priority Measure Yes
Specifications Registry
Measure Type Process
Specialty Pathology

Measure Description

Pathology reports based on biopsy and/or cytology specimens with a diagnosis of primary non-small cell lung cancer classified into specific histologic type or classified as NSCLC-NOS with an explanation included in the pathology report

 

Instructions

This measure is to be submitted each time a patient’s pathology report addresses specimens with a diagnosis of non- small cell lung cancer; however, only one quality-data code (QDC) per date of service for a patient is required. This measure may be submitted by Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) eligible clinicians who perform the quality actions described in the measure based on the services provided and the measure-specific denominator coding.

Measure Submission Type:

Measure data may be submitted by individual MIPS eligible clinicians, groups, or third party intermediaries. The listed denominator criteria are used to identify the intended patient population. The numerator options included in this specification are used to submit the quality actions as allowed by the measure. The quality-data codes listed do not need to be submitted by MIPS eligible clinicians, groups, or third party intermediaries that utilize this modality for submissions; however, these codes may be submitted for those third party intermediaries that utilize Medicare Part B claims data. For more information regarding Application Programming Interface (API), please refer to the Quality Payment Program (QPP) website.

 

Denominator

Biopsy and cytology specimen reports with a diagnosis of primary non-small cell lung cancer

Denominator Criteria (Eligible Cases):

Patients ≥ 18 years of age on date of encounter

AND

Diagnosis for lung cancer (ICD-10-CM): C34.00, C34.01, C34.02, C34.10, C34.11, C34.12, C34.2, C34.30, C34.31, C34.32, C34.80, C34.81, C34.82, C34.90, C34.91, C34.92

AND

Patient encounter during performance period (CPT): 88104, 88108, 88112, 88173, 88305

AND NOT

DENOMINATOR EXCLUSIONS:

Specimen site other than anatomic location of lung or is not classified as primary non-small cell lung cancer: G9420

 

Numerator

Biopsy and cytology specimen reports with a diagnosis of primary non-small cell lung cancer classified into specific histologic type (squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma) OR classified as NSCLC-NOS with an explanation included in the pathology report

Numerator Options:

Performance Met: Primary non-small cell lung cancer biopsy and cytology specimen report documents classification into specific histologic type OR classified as NSCLC-NOS with an explanation (G9418)

OR

Denominator Exception: Documentation of medical reason(s) for not including the histological type OR NSCLC-NOS classification with an explanation (e.g., biopsy taken for other purposes in a patient with a history of primary non-small cell lung cancer or other documented medical reasons) (G9419)

OR

Performance Not Met: Primary non-small cell lung cancer biopsy and cytology specimen report does not document classification into specific histologic type OR classified as NSCLC-NOS with an explanation (G9421)

 

Rationale

Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of major cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. The classifications of lung cancer published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1967, 1981, and 1999 were written primarily by pathologists for pathologists. Only in the 2004 revision, relevant genetics and clinical information were introduced. Nevertheless, because of remarkable advances over the last 6 years in our understanding of lung adenocarcinoma, particularly in the area of medical oncology, molecular biology, and radiology, there is a pressing need for a revised classification, based not on pathology alone, but rather on an integrated multidisciplinary platform.

For the first time, this classification addresses an approach to small biopsies and cytology in lung cancer diagnosis. Recent data regarding epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation predicting responsiveness to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), toxicities, and therapeutic efficacy have established the importance of distinguishing squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) not otherwise specified (NOS) in patients with advanced lung cancer. Approximately 70% of lung cancers are diagnosed and staged by small biopsies or cytology rather than surgical resection specimens, with increasing use of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), endobronchial ultrasound-guided TBNA and esophageal ultrasoundguided needle aspiration. Within the NSCLC group, most pathologists can identify well- or moderately-differentiated squamous cell carcinomas or adenocarcinomas, but specific diagnoses are more difficult with poorly differentiated tumors. Nevertheless, in small biopsies and/or cytology specimens, 10 to 30% of specimens continue to be diagnosed as NSCLC-NOS.


Clinical Recommendation Statements

To address advances in oncology, molecular biology, pathology, radiology, and surgery of lung adenocarcinoma, an international multidisciplinary classification was sponsored by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society. This new adenocarcinoma classification is needed to provide uniform terminology and diagnostic criteria, especially for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), the overall approach to small non-resection cancer specimens, and for multidisciplinary strategic management of tissue for molecular and immunohistochemical studies.

For small biopsies and cytology, we recommend that NSCLC be further classified into a more specific histologic type, such as adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, whenever possible (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

We recommend that the term NSCLC-NOS be used as little as possible and we recommend it be applied only when a more specific diagnosis is not possible by morphology and/or special stains (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence).

The above strategy for classification of adenocarcinoma versus other histologies and the terminology should be used in routine diagnosis and future research and clinical trials so that there is uniform classification of disease cohorts in relationship to tumor subtypes.

Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2011; 6:244-285.

Register with MDinteractive